（A）Yes，because Cassie was a business invitee on the premises of the toy store．
（B）Yes，because F.A.O. Schwarfz was in control of the premises at the time of the accident．
（C）No， because the “Buffalo Bob” doll may have been dislodged by another customer．
（D）No，unless the “Buffalo Bob” doll had been displayed on the edge of the shelf in a negligent manner by one of F.A.O. Schwartz's employees．
20. Amos is the owner in fee simple of Blackacre. a 7-acre tract， on which he maintains a dwelling house for himself and his family．Adjoining Blackacre is Whiteacre，a 10-acre tract，owned by Andy．In order to gain access to the highway， Amos has an easement to cross over Whiteacre．
Amos has recently purchased Greenacre，a 12-acre tract，which abuts Whiteacre but is not appurtenant to Blackacre. Amos has begun constructing a farmhouse on Greenacre and is using the existing easement （across Whiteacre） to gain access to the 12-acre tract．Amos has never received permission from Andy to use the road across Whiteacre to gain access to Greenacre．
In an appropriate action by Andy to enjoin Amos from using the existing easement to gain access to Greenacre，the plaintiff will most likely
（A）succeed，because Amos is making use of the servient tenement beyond the scope and extent of the easement as it was originally created
（B）succeed，because Amos has no right to use the servient tenement in connection with a tract of land which is not part of the dominant tenement
（C）not succeed，because Amos has an easement by necessity
（D）not succeed，because Amos has a right to use the easement in a manner not inconsistent with the rights of the owner of the servient tenement
（1）Please translate the following paragraph into English
（2） Please translate the following paragraph into Chinese
2-202. Final Written Expression: Parol or Extrinsic Evidence.
Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented
（a） by course of dealing or usage of trade （Section 1-205） or by course of performance （Section 2-208）; and
（b） by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement .
Suppose you were Marie Lin， a lawyer of SHICHENG LAW FIRM， you have known that Max Chen wants to retain a legal consulting firm from a friend. Now， please write a letter to Max Chen， persuade him to choose your law firm. You also send him your firm brochure.
Max Chen's address: ABC corporation， Cyber Tower， Suite 119， Haidian， Beijing， China.
Please pay more attention to format of your letter.